Site MapHelpFeedbackChapter Outline
Chapter Outline
(See related pages)



  1. Characteristics of the Scientific Method
    1. Skeptical Attitude
      1. Skepticism is necessary because behavior is complex
        1. Many factors are needed to explain behavior
        2. It is difficult to identify these factors
      2. Skepticism is necessary because science is a human endeavor
        1. Scientists are not passive observers
        2. Many decisions made in science are subjective
    2. Objectives
      1. Four (4) objectives are met through the scientific method
        1. Description is defining and classifying events and their relationships
          1. Descriptions must have reliability
          2. Descriptions must have validity
        2. Prediction is based on description
        3. Control involves development of treatment and preventive strategies
        4. Understanding of behavior consists of identify cause(s)
          1. Covariation of events refers to two events varying together
          2. Time-order relationship where cause must occur before effect
          3. Elimination of plausible alternative causes rules out other likely causes
      2. Internal and External Validity
        1. Confounding often arises when eliminating plausible alternative explanations
        2. Studies free of confounding have internal validity
        3. External validity refers to degree to which results can be generalized
        4. Generalizability is ability of a finding to be applied to different populations, settings, and conditions
        5. Representativeness determines generalizability and refers to degree to which sample matches population
        6. Random sampling achieves representativeness; a random sample is where everyone in population has equal chance of being included
        7. Many studies use samples of convenience
        8. To replicate a study tests its generalizability
    3. Scientific Procedures
      1. The Hypothesis
        1. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation for behavior
        2. Intuition and hunches often play roles in developing a hypothesis
        3. Clinicians develop hypotheses by observing their patients' reactions to treatment
      2. Operational Definitions
        1. Hypotheses must be falsifiable, that is stated in a way that it can be proven untrue
        2. Terms in hypothesis must have operational definitions with regard to operations that can be measured or observed
      3. Methods of Control
        1. Independent variable is factor that is manipulated to measure its effects
        2. Dependent variable is factor that may be affected and whose changes will be measured
        3. Internal validity when control techniques are properly used
          1. Independent variable is manipulated at two levels: experimental group and control group
          2. Other variables are held constant to prevent confounding
          3. Balancing is used to control factors that cannot be held constant; random assignment is the most important balancing technique
        4. Minimizing the effects of expectations
          1. Demand characteristics are expectations that the subject has
          2. Experimenter effects are biases from experimenter expectations
          3. Placebo and placebo subject groups are procedures to control for demand characteristics and experimenter effect
          4. Double-blind procedure is when subject and experimenter are unaware of which treatment is given
        5. Statistical inference is used to conclude that results are real and not due to chance
          1. Assumption of null hypothesis
          2. Use of probability theory to determine odds of obtaining results if null hypothesis were correct
          3. Statistically significant leads to rejection of null hypothesis
        6. Problems with statistical inference
          1. Statistical significance does not necessarily mean finding is important
          2. Statistical significance does not necessarily mean clinical significance
  2. Research Designs
    1. Correlational Research
      1. Correlational research examines relationships
      2. In case-control designs, cases (those with mental disorder) are compared with controls (those who do not)
      3. Correlation does not show causal relationships
      4. Relationships between variables may be due to third-variable problem
      5. Matching may solve third-variable problem
      6. Longitudinal studies involve examining same subjects over period of time
        1. High-risk designs involve examining subjects who have high likelihood of developing a disorder
        2. Genetic high-risk designs include subjects who are genetically predisposed to disorder
        3. Behavioral high-risk designs include subjects who have some behavioral characteristic that makes them at risk
        4. Caution is needed when inferring causation
    2. Epidemiological Studies
      1. Epidemiology studies frequency and distribution of disorders within specific populations
        1. Incidence is number of new cases within given time period
        2. Prevalence is percentage of population that has disorder
        3. Duration is average length of disorder
      2. Epidemiological studies are prone to pitfalls such as unrepresentative samples
    3. Experimental Designs
      1. Clinical Trials
        1. Clinical trials test effectiveness of treatments
        2. Empirically supported treatments are those that pass the test of controlled experimental research but may not be clinically significant
      2. Analogue Experiments
        1. Analogue experiments are experiments that serve as models of real life
        2. A high degree of internal validity is possible due to types of control necessary to identify causal relationships
        3. Allows testing of variables that otherwise could not be manipulated
        4. The more ethical an analogue experiment is, the less analogous it is likely to be
        5. Animal models can be used to address problems of analogue experiments
          1. Animal models allow variables to be held constant
          2. Some procedures are too intrusive to be used with humans
          3. Long-term consequences of treatment and disorder can be assessed
        6. Threats to external validity exist in analogue experiments
    4. The Single-Case Experiment
      1. Multiple groups of subject pose problems
      2. Single-case experiment focuses on one person
      3. First stage is baseline: behavior before treatment is assessed
      4. Treatment is introduced; comparison is made
      5. Common design is ABAB: baseline, treatment, baseline, treatment
      6. Multiple-baseline design does not involve an interruption of treatment
      7. Limitation of single-case design is weak external validity







AlloyOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 3 > Chapter Outline