Site MapHelpFeedbackChapter Summary
Chapter Summary
(See related pages)

Competition, interactions between individuals that reduce their fitness, is generally divided into intraspecific competition, competition between individuals of the same species, and interspecific competition, competition between individuals of different species. Competition can take the form of interference competition, direct aggressive interactions, or resource competition in which individuals compete through their dependence on the same limiting resources.

Studies of intraspecific competition provide evidence for resource limitation. Experiments with herbaceous plants show that soil nutrients may limit plant growth rates and plant weight and that competition for nutrients increases with plant population density. Plants reflect their competition for resources, including water, light, and nutrients, through the process of self-thinning. Resource competition among leafhoppers also varies with population density and is reflected in reduced survivorship, smaller size, and increased developmental time at higher population densities. Experiments with terrestrial isopods show that even where there is no food shortage, intraspecific competition through interference may be substantial.

The niche reflects the environmental requirements of species. The niche concept was developed early in the history of ecology and has had a prominent place in the study of interspecific competition because of the competitive exclusion principle: two species with identical niches cannot coexist indefinitely. Hutchinson added the concepts of the fundamental niche, the physical conditions under which a species might live in the absence of other species, and the realized niche, the more restricted conditions under which a species actually lives as the result of interactions with other species. While a species' niche is theoretically defined by a very large number of biotic and abiotic factors, Hutchinson's n-dimensional hypervolume, the most important attributes of the niche of most species, can often be summarized by a few variables. For instance, the niches of Galápagos finches are largely determined by their feeding requirements, while the niche of a salt marsh grass can be defined by tidal levels.

Mathematical and laboratory models provide a theoretical foundation for studying competitive interactions in nature. Lotka and Volterra independently expanded the logistic model of population growth to represent interspecific competition. In the Lotka-Volterra competition model, the growth rate of a species depends both upon numbers of conspecifics and numbers of the competing species. In this model, the effect of one species upon another is summarized by competition coefficients. In general, the Lotka-Volterra competition model predicts coexistence of species when interspecific competition is less intense than intraspecific competition. Competitive exclusion in laboratory experiments suggests the potential for competitive exclusion in nature. Even in the laboratory, however, organisms yield results that are much less predictable than the predictions of the Lotka-Volterra competition equations.

Competition can have significant ecological and evolutionary influences on the niches of species. Field experiments involving organisms from herbaceous plants to desert rodents have demonstrated that competition can restrict the niches of species to a narrower set of conditions than they would otherwise occupy in the absence of competition. Theoretically, natural selection may lead to divergence in the niches of competing species, a situation called character displacement. However, stringent requirements for a definitive demonstration have limited the number of documented cases of character displacement in nature. After many decades of theoretical and experimental work on competition, we can conclude that competition is a common and strong force operating in nature, but not always and not everywhere.

The field experiment is one of the most powerful and important tools at the disposal of the field ecologist. However, the validity of field experiments depends upon several design features, including (1) knowledge of initial conditions, (2) controls, and (3) replication. Detailed experimental work on competitive interactions between indigenous and introduced species have the potential to generate information that will predict the potential pathways of interaction between species and the time to competitive exclusion.







EcologyOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 13 > Chapter Summary