Site MapHelpFeedbackChapter Summary
Chapter Summary
(See related pages)

A food web summarizes the feeding relations in a community. The earliest work on food webs concentrated on simplified communities in areas such as the Arctic islands. However, researchers such as Charles Elton (1927) soon found that even these so-called simple communities included very complex feeding relations. The level of food web complexity increased substantially, however, as researchers began to study complex communities. Studies of the food webs of tropical freshwater fish communities revealed highly complex networks of trophic interaction that persisted even in the face of various simplifications. A focus on strong interactions can simplify food web structure and identify those interactions responsible for most of the energy flow in communities.

The feeding activities of a few keystone species may control the structure of communities. Robert Paine (1966) proposed that the feeding activities of a few species have inordinate influences on community structure. He predicted that some predators may increase species diversity by reducing the probability of competitive exclusion. Manipulative studies of predaceous species have identified many keystone species, including starfish and snails in the marine intertidal zone and fish in rivers. On land, birds exert substantial influences on communities of their arthropod prey. Jane Lubchenko (1978) demonstrated that the influence of consumers on community structure depends upon their feeding preferences, their local population density, and the relative competitive abilities of prey species. Keystone species are those that, despite low biomass, exert strong effects on the structure of the communities they inhabit.

Exotic predators can collapse and simplify the structure of food webs. Introduced fishes have devastated the native fishes of Lake Atitlan and Gatun Lake in Central America. Introduction of the Nile perch is rapidly reducing the species-rich fish fauna of Lake Victoria to a community dominated by a handful of species. The influence of the Nile perch on the fish community of Lake Victoria is enmeshed with massive changes in the lake's ecosystem.

Mutualists can act as keystone species. Experimental studies have shown that cleaner fish, species that remove parasites from other fish, act as keystone species on coral reefs. Removing cleaner fish produces a decline in reef fish species richness. Ants that disperse plant seeds in the fynbos of South Africa have been shown to have major influences on plant community structure. Where invading ants have displaced the mutualistic dispersing ants, the plant community suffers a decline in species richness following fires. Other mutualistic organisms that may act as keystone species include pollinators and mycorrhizal fungi.

Humans have acted as keystone species in communities. People have long manipulated food webs both as a consequence of their own feeding activities and by introducing or deleting species from existing food webs. In addition, many of these manipulations have been focused on keystone species. Hunters in tropical rain forests have been responsible for removing keystone animal species from large areas of the rain forests of Central and South America. Chinese farmers have used ants as keystone predators to control pests in citrus orchards for over 1,700 years.








EcologyOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 17 > Chapter Summary