Student Center | Instructor Center | Information Center | Home
Personality Psychology
Student Center
Image Library
PowerWeb

Chapter Objectives
Chapter Outline
Multiple Choice Quiz
True or False

Feedback
Help Center



Interpersonal aspects of personality
Larsen/Buss cover

Chapter Outline

Interpersonal Aspects of Personality

Introduction
Three Mechanisms of Social Interaction
  • Personality interacts with situations in three ways
    • Selection
      • Personality characteristics of others influence whether we select them as dates, friends, or marriage partners
      • Own personality characteristics play role in kinds of situations we select to enter and stay in
    • Evocation
      • Personality characteristics of others evoke responses in us
      • Own personality characteristics evoke responses in others
      • Manipulation
        • Personality is linked to ways in which we try to influence or manipulate others
Personality Characteristics Desired in a Marriage Partner (Buss et al., 1990
  • Over 10,000 participants, from 37 samples in 33 countries, six continents, five islands
  • Mutual attraction/love is the most favored characteristic
  • Almost as important are personality characteristics of dependable character, emotional stability, pleasing disposition
Assortative Mating for Personality: The Search for the Similar
  • Assortative mating: People are married to people who are similar to themselves
  • Are these positive correlations caused by active selection of mates who are similar, or by-products of other causal processes (e.g., sheer proximity)
  • To answer questions, Botwin et al. (1997) studied dating and married couples
    • Correlated preferences for personality characteristics desired in a potential mate, and our own personality characteristics
    • Correlations are consistently positive: Positive correlations between spouses are due, in part, to direct social preferences, based on personality characteristics of those doing the selecting
Do People Get the Mates They Want?
  • Botwin et al. (1997): Correlations between preferences for ideal personality characteristics in a mate and the actual personality characteristics of an obtained mate
  • Consistently positive correlations: People seem to get mates they want in terms of personality
  • Partner's personality had a large effect on marital satisfaction
  • People are especially happy if they are married to partners high on agreeableness, emotional stability, and openness
  • But difference in scores between partner's personality and one's ideal for that personality did not predict happiness
Personality and the Selective Break-Up of Couples
  • According to violation of desire theory (Buss, 1994), break-ups should be more common when one's desires are violated than when they are fulfilled
  • People actively seek mates who are dependable and emotionally stable, and those who fail to choose such mates are at risk for divorce
  • Those who fail to get what they want—including a mate who is similar—tend to selectively break-up more often than those who get what they want
Shyness and the Selection of Risky Situations
  • Shyness: Tendency to feel tense, worried, and anxious during social interactions or even when anticipating social interactions
  • During adolescence, early adulthood, shy people tend to avoid social situations, resulting in a form of isolation
  • Shy women are less likely to go to a gynecologist
  • Shy women also are less likely to bring up contraception with potential sexual partner
  • Shyness affects whether a person is willing to select risky situations in the form of gambles
  • Shyness, in short, has a substantial impact on selective entry into, or avoidance of, situations
Personality Traits and the Selection of Situations
  • Personality affects situations to which people are exposed through selective entry into, or avoidance of, certain activities
Evocation
  • Once we select others to occupy our social environment, second class of processes set into motion—evocation of reactions from others and evocation of our own reactions by others
  • Aggression and the Evocation of Hostility
    • Aggressive people evoke hostility from others
    • Hostile attributional bias: Tendency to infer hostile intent on the part of others in the face of uncertain behavior from others
    • Because they expect others to be hostile, aggressive people treat others aggressively—people treated aggressively tend to aggress back
    • Thus, hostility from others is evoked by an aggressive person
    Evocation of Anger and Upset in Partners
    • Person can perform actions that cause emotional response in a partner
    • Person can elicit actions from another that upset the original elicitor
    • Study by Buss (1991): Role of personality on evocation of anger and upset in married couples
      • Assessed personality characteristics of husbands and wives
      • Strongest predictors of upset are low agreeableness and emotional instability
    Evocation Through Expectancy Confirmation
    • Expectancy confirmation: People's beliefs about personality characteristics of others cause them to evoke in others actions that are consistent with initial beliefs
    • Snyder and Swann (1978): People's beliefs led them to behave in an aggressive manner toward an unsuspecting target, then the target behaved in a more aggressive manner, confirming initial beliefs
Manipulation—Social Influence Tactics
  • Manipulation or social influence includes ways in which people intentionally alter, change, or exploit others
  • Manipulation can be examined from two perspectives within personality psychology
    • Are some individuals consistently more manipulative than others?
    • Given that all people attempt to influence others, do stable personality characteristics predict tactics that are used?
    A Taxonomy of 11 Tactics of Manipulation (Buss et al., 1987)
    • Nominations of acts of influence
    • Factor analysis of self-reports and observer-reports of nominated acts
    • 11 tactics identified, including charm, coercion, silent treatment, reason
    Sex Differences in Tactics of Manipulation
    • With exception of regression (crying, whining), men and women are similar in performance of tactics of manipulation
    Personality Predictors of Tactics of Manipulation
    • High surgency: Coercion, responsibility invocation
    • Low surgency: Self-abasement, hardball
    • High agreeable: Pleasure induction, reason
    • Low agreeable: Coercion, silent treatment
    • High conscientiousness: Reason
    • Emotionally unstable people use a variety of tactics to manipulate others, but the most common is regression
    • High intellect-openness: Reason, pleasure induction, responsibility invocation
    • Low intellect-openness: Social comparison
    A Closer Look: The Machiavellian Personality
    • Machiavellianism: Manipulative strategy of social interaction, personality style that uses other people as tools for personal gain
    • People who score high on Machiavellianism ("high Machs") select situations that are loosely structure, untethered by rules that restrict the deployment of exploitative strategy
    • High Machs tend to evoke specific reactions from others, such as anger and retaliation for having been exploited
    • High Machs influence or manipulate others in predictable ways, using tactics that are exploitative, self-serving, and deceptive
Summary and Evaluation
  • Personality does not exist solely in the heads of individuals
  • Personality affects the ways in which we interact with others in our social world
    • We select people and environments, choosing social situations to which we will expose ourselves—personality plays a key role in the selection process
    • We evoke emotions and actions in others, based in part on our personality characteristics
    • Personality plays a key role in which we use tactics to influence or manipulate others