Attributions and Achievement What happens to self-serving bias when it serves different selves? It
still exists, but not always in the same form. Ng et al. (1995) compared
the reasons that New Zealand European and Singapore Chinese university
students gave for their success and failure on school exams. Both groups
rated their own efforts as most important to success and failure. For the
second most important factor, the New Zealanders followed the typical
self-serving bias rankings, citing their ability as crucial to their
successes and linking the exam's difficulty to their failures. The
Singapore Chinese students, however, showed a completely different
pattern. After effort, they rated luck and their study techniques as
important to all exam performances. However, they cited luck twice as
often for their successes as their failures. They ranked ability much
lower and barely mentioned task difficulty at all. To explain these
results, Ng et al. cited a "self-effacing" bias in Asian
culture. In contrast to Westerners, Singapore Chinese students are more
likely to accept personal responsibility for their failures and to
attribute success to the situation or a group, a pattern that can help
maintain social harmony. |