McGraw-Hill OnlineMcGraw-Hill Higher EducationLearning Center
Student Center | Instructor Center | Information Center | Home
Career Opportunities
Glossary
Internet Guide
Study Skills Primer
Statistics Primer
Grade Summit
PowerWeb
Learning Objectives
Chapter Outline
Multiple Choice Quiz
Glossary
Flashcards
Interactive Activities
Crossword Puzzle
Web Links
FAQs
Around The Globe
For More Information
Feedback
Help Center


Psychology 5/e Book Cover
Psychology, 5/e
Lester M. Sdorow, Arcadia University
Cheryl A. Rickabaugh, University of Redlands

Social Psychology

Around The Globe

Attributions and Achievement

What happens to self-serving bias when it serves different selves? It still exists, but not always in the same form. Ng et al. (1995) compared the reasons that New Zealand European and Singapore Chinese university students gave for their success and failure on school exams. Both groups rated their own efforts as most important to success and failure. For the second most important factor, the New Zealanders followed the typical self-serving bias rankings, citing their ability as crucial to their successes and linking the exam's difficulty to their failures. The Singapore Chinese students, however, showed a completely different pattern. After effort, they rated luck and their study techniques as important to all exam performances. However, they cited luck twice as often for their successes as their failures. They ranked ability much lower and barely mentioned task difficulty at all. To explain these results, Ng et al. cited a "self-effacing" bias in Asian culture. In contrast to Westerners, Singapore Chinese students are more likely to accept personal responsibility for their failures and to attribute success to the situation or a group, a pattern that can help maintain social harmony.