McGraw-Hill OnlineMcGraw-Hill Higher EducationLearning Center
Student Center | Home
Current News
Weekly Update
Glossary
Chapter Introduction
Interactive Exercise 1
Web Map 1
Web Map 2
Web Map 3
A Further Note 1
Interactive Exercise 2
Web Table 1
A Further Note 2
Web Map 4
Interactive Exercise 3
A Further Note 3
Analyze the Issue 1
Chapter 13 Quiz
Web Links
Chapter Specific News
PowerWeb Articles
Feedback
Help Center


International Politics on the World Stage, Brief 4/e
World Politics: International Politics on the World Stage, Brief, 4/e
John T. Rourke, University of Connecticut - Storrs
Mark A. Boyer, University of Connecticut - Storrs

Preserving and Enhancing Human Rights and Dignity

The Road to Beijing and Beyond

The most recent well-publicized effort to advance women's rights globally was the fourth World Conference on Women (WCW) that convened in Beijing in September 1995. Building on the third conference, held in Nairobi in 1985, and also on other events such as the 1994 UN Conference on Population and Development (UNCPD) held in Cairo, the WCW had three "priority themes": equality (especially equal pay for equal work), development (with an emphasis on population, nutrition, and health factors), and peace (particularly eradicating societal and family abuse of women).

The 188-page report that emerged from the WCW declared that women have the right to decide freely on all matters related to their sexuality and child-bearing. This included a condemnation of forced sterilizations and abortions. The final document denounced rape in wartime as a war crime and called on national governments to intervene to prevent the genital mutilation of girls, bride burning, and all spousal abuse. The conference also called for the economic empowerment of women. To this end, it demanded an end to sexual harassment at work. The document further called for public and private lending organizations to extend credit to low-income women for establishing small businesses and other economic betterment projects and for an end of forbidding women to inherit their husband's property (Scott, 1996).

There were, of course, controversies. The ongoing sensitivities of some Roman Catholic, Muslim, and other countries to the issue of abortion led to language in the final document that was not as strong as some abortion-rights advocates wished. Lesbian rights were debated internationally for the first time, but no language was included in the report.

In many ways, though, the specifics about what the conference said are less important than the fact that it happened and that it voiced the concerns of women and presented their goals to a global audience. The official conference at Beijing was attended by some 3,000 delegates from 180 countries. The U.S. delegation was headed by first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton; UN ambassador and future U.S. secretary of state Madeleine Albright was the deputy head of the delegation. There was also a huge parallel conference for NGOs at nearby Huairou, which drew 30,000 delegates representing some 2,000 NGOs. In short, the meetings in China constituted the largest conclave of women in history. Not only could women meet and strengthen their already formidable network of women's groups, but their collective voice was carried outward by the 2,500 reporters who covered the conferences.

While the Beijing conference's platform of action was not binding on states, it set a standard that has already begun to have an impact. In June 1996, for example, The Hague Tribunal on war crimes in Bosnia declared for the first time in history that rape in war is a war crime by indicting eight Bosnian Serb soldiers for the rape of Bosnian Muslim women. "This is a landmark indictment because it focuses exclusively on sexual assaults, without including any other charges," noted a tribunal spokesperson.1

The meetings in China also strengthened the resolve of women to campaign against cultural sexism. Mahnaz Afkhami, an Iranian exile who heads an NGO, the Sisterhood Is Global Institute, and who is a leader of the effort to establish a Muslim women's movement, was able to meet with women from Iran. "The Iranian women were under enormous constraint," she noted, but she also found that while "they may have had to wear the chador (traditional full-cover garment),...they didn't have a conservative line... That kind of interaction is very important."2

Notes

1. New York Times, June 28, 1996, p. A1.

2. New York Times, May 12, 1996, p. A3.