Site MapHelpFeedbackDemocracies or McDonald's; What Builds World Peace?
Democracies or McDonald's; What Builds World Peace?
(See related pages)


As we have discussed, democratic peace theory posits that democracies do not fight other democracies. Although democratic states go to war with nondemocratic states and nondemocratic states will go to war with other nondemocratic states, domestic pressures and shared norms of behavior prevent democracies from going to war with other democracies.

Democratic peace theorists believe that the chance of war is less in a democracy because decision makers are restrained by the multiplicity of political structures and voices in policy making. In addition, the electoral chances of a democratic leader may be jeopardized if a conflict does not have popular support. Some scholars argue that democracies are likely to become allies with other democracies because they share similar values. As a result, democratic states tend to share benign perceptions of each other. Other democratic peace theory scholars assert that democratic leaders and societies are socialized by democratic norms to settle domestic discrepancies peacefully, and are predisposed to settle international differences in the same manner. In short, those arguing for the validity of the democratic peace believe that the spread of democracy will lead to less bellicosity. If all states become democratic, the international system would be more peaceful.

But still others argue that the findings about the democratic peace are coincidental and not the result of democracy causing peace. Some commentators, for instance, have even pointed out that no two states who have had MacDonald's restaurants established within their borders have ever gone to war. So maybe, we should begin to talk about the Big Mac theory of peace? But more seriously, to get you thinking about what helps to produce more peaceful relations among states in the international system and to understand what your peers think, as well, we ask that you answer the following questions which will be tabulated for all the students using this book.

Mark in the appropriate box your answer for each of the ten statements below. Don't think too much about your answer. Your initial reaction is what is important. When you are finished, submit your answers. You will then be able to see the results of your survey.


1

Do you think electoral politics affects a president's decision to engage in a military conflict?
A)Most of the time
B)Sometimes
C)Almost never
D)Undecided
2

Do you think interest groups influence a democratic leader's decision to engage in war?
A)Most of the time
B)Sometimes
C)Almost never
D)Undecided
3

Do you believe that the democratic process within a state socializes diplomats and leaders to build consensus and compromise in international politics?
A)Yes
B)No
C)Don't know
4

Do you think that the spread of democracy can lead to a more peaceful international system?
A)Yes
B)No
C)Don't know
5

Do you think diplomats and leaders from democratic states are more likely to negotiate and bargain than diplomats and leaders from nondemocratic states?
A)More Likely
B)No Difference
C)Don't know
6

Do you think internal conditions (e.g. economic hardship) could influence a democratic state to go to war with another democratic state?
A)Very likely
B)Possible
C)Unlikely
D)Don't know
7

Do you think it is plausible that public pressure in a democracy could induce war with another democracy?
A)Very likely
B)Possible
C)Unlikely
D)Don't know
8

Do you think it is possible that Germany and France will fight each other in war again if they continue to be stable democracies?
A)Very likely
B)Possible
C)Unlikely
D)Don't know
9

Do you think it is possible that the U.S. and Japan could go to war if they remain stable democracies?
A)Very likely
B)Possible
C)Unlikely
D)Don't know
10

Do you agree with the assumptions and predictions of democratic peace theorists?
A)Yes
B)No
C)Not sure







Rourke 9/eOnline Learning Center with Powerweb

Home > Chapter 8 > Survey