You must have javascript enabled to view this website. Please change your browser preferences to enable javascript, and reload this page.
A. Budget Talk
Last night you attended a city council meeting at which the city manager, Harold Born, submitted an idea for financing long-range construction that would avoid the issuance of bonds. Born also submitted three sets of tables regarding his proposed budget:
You show the city editor your notes from the portion of the meeting that was concerned with the budget. Here are your notes:
Council members: Albert Fuentes, Bernard Garner, Fred E. Smith, Martin Davis and Marcia Gold. Fuentes: "I think we owe thanks to Harold for the splendid job. I know he's spent considerable time working with department heads over the past few months, adjusting their needs to our realities." Garner: "Right. This looks like a hold-tight budget, and I think we all like it. Except for one item, the one that says General Improvement in Lieu of Bonds." Born: "Let me explain that. We need to put away money for what I project as a needed expansion of the sewage treatment plant and water lines. Also, we will have to lay out some new roads to the subdivision south sooner or later. I don't see anything immediate but I want to start building up a fund. That way we won't have to borrow and pay interest. Right now interest rates are way up and we are bonded close to our limit. Also, our debt service is high." Smith: "But it adds to taxes, doesn't it?" Born: "Yes, a few mills." Davis: "So the taxpayer has to shoulder the burden." Born: "Less, actually, than if you had to sell bonds."
Current year mill levy: $20,920
Tangible assessed value of real property: $31,798,794. (Assessed valuation is 50% of market value. Average home has market value of $90,000.)
Funds raised from ad valorem taxes are supplemented by fees, licenses, fines, etc., and the total makes up the total expenditure. Total indebtedness January: $6,611,372.
Current year property tax revenue: $665,200.
Gold: "Of course we all want to save money, but isn't there also a principle involved, of making the people who benefit from the services pay for them? I mean, why should present taxpayers pay for future benefits? Bonds are a much fairer way of assessing costs." Davis: "I have a feeling that all of us are a bit gun-shy of that item, Harold." Smith: "Yes, we can't add to taxes now. The home owner is absolutely strapped, with this and the school tax going up."Garner: "Suppose we cut it out. How much do we save on the mill levy, Harold?" Born: "I can figure that out in a few ..." Davis: "Don't bother now. Bring it in in two weeks when I think we're just going to go through the motions of adopting your budget without that item. Agreed?" (Various nods and grunts of approval of Davis' statement.)
After reading these excerpts, the city editor says it seems certain the council will adopt the budget at the next meeting, after striking out the item for General improvement (in lieu of bonds). He says that it appears to him that you can figure out the budget yourself because all the figures are available. You look at him, trying not to appear too perplexed. He senses your trouble and volunteers to take you step-by-step through the figures and to the story, which he says you should then be able to write by yourself. First, he says, look at Table A and strike the item General improvement (in lieu of bonds). Then refigure the proposed expenditures. He suggests you do that on your own and return with the total proposed budget for next year. You go to your seat and do the figuring. No problem, really:
As you are about to return to the editor, something strikes you. If you subtracted the same $95,396 figure from the total on Table C you would get the total ad valorem tax requirement. You know that this is the amount of money to be raised from the property tax. So, on your own, you do that:
That is a key figure. It is going to be the basis of the mill levy, you know. But you cannot recall how the levy is figured. You ask the city editor to tell you. He says that if you multiply the total assessed valuation by the mill levy, you will get the funds raised from the property tax, also known as the mill levy. This, you see, makes the following equation: Mill levy X assessed valuation = total raised from the property tax You pick up the assessed valuation of the city's real estate from Table A and from Table C you take the total taxes needed from the property tax or mill levy:
Mill levy X $31,798,794 = $725,779
Or, to put it in easy form for figuring out:
Mill levy = $725,779 / $31,798,794
Mill levy = $.0228241
That is 2.282 cents on the dollar, and because your city uses a mill levy on $1,000 assessed valuation, the tax levy on property is $22.82/$1,000 in assessed valuation. You show this to your editor and he congratulates you and suggests you check it with the city manager. Born verifies your figures and confirms your feeling that the budget will be adopted at the next meeting without his item, which would have added three mills, or $3/$1,000 in property tax, he tells you. Write a story of 500 or more words, quoting from the commission meeting.
B. School Board
The Pennsbury School Board met last night and adopted next year's budget by a vote of 5–1. The board had discussed the budget during the spring. This meeting took 10 minutes. Three board members were absent. You are to write 500 to 750 words from the following information:
The expenditures will total $21,743,000 as compared with $20,617,000 last year. The new budget will require a property tax of 108.5 mills, compared with 102.5 last year. When the school district first presented the budget to the board last spring, a 13.5 mill increase would have been necessary. Over the past several weeks, the board cut various items from the budget on its own and after public hearings. Board member Francis Martin, the lone dissenter, said, "I'd like to save the taxpayer money. I'd like to see the athletic account back to where it was last year. I'd like to see more money taken out of the budget reserve to decrease the millage." He said the savings could be half a mill off the school tax. Raymond Wiese, vice president of the board, opposed the suggestion. "I think if we did that we'd be cutting it pretty close. There are a number of factors that may hit us, like a wrong guess on heating and lighting costs. There's the unknown impact of children leaving nonpublic schools and the cost of transportation into New Jersey, especially if some of these schools start holding Saturday sessions." Those voting to adopt the budget were Morris Feldman, president of the board; Wiese; William Gummere; George Littleton and Robert McKelvie.
Presume this is June 27, and next year's budget will take effect in the school year beginning in September. Tables D, E and F and Figures 1 and 2 are sheets from the budget you must consult for background for your story. The average home in the Pennsbury School District is assessed at $30,000, but many people live in homes assessed at half that. Use both figures in your estimates of what the home owner will pay. Of the total $21,743,000 budget, $15,140,421 will be raised through the property tax.
Figure 1
(20.0K)
Figure 2
(39.0K)
C. Proposed
It is now April of the year following the budget adopted in B. School Board. The district superintendent of the Pennsbury School District, Ernest H. Mueller, last night submitted the school budget to the Pennsbury School Board for the coming year. The proposed budget totals $24,168,000. A total of $18,413,449 will be raised from the property tax toward the total budget. This will necessitate a property tax of 130 mills, or $130/$1,000 in assessed valuation. You have the current year's budget totals (See Exercise B. School Board) and you can compare the two. From these comparisons and the pages taken from the proposed budget (Tables G, H and I and Figures 2, 3a, 3b and 4), write a 400- to 500-word story.
Pennsbury School DistrictFallsington, PennsylvaniaApril 12MemoTo: Pennsbury School BoardFr: Ernest H. Mueller, District Superintendent I hereby transmit to you the Pennsbury School District's tentative budget proposed for the next school year. This document is the result of many hours of deliberation on the part of individual building staffs and central administration. Only through the cooperation and input of everyone concerned with the budget has it been possible to prioritize the district's needs and produce a budget that will provide those basic needs and still not overburden the tax-paying community. We are fully aware of what burdens these fiscally difficult times placed upon the taxpayers; yet they, too, must be aware that the same inflationary escalations that affect their family and business budgets also seriously affect a school budget. Holding the total tentative budget increase to only 11.15% has required maximum efforts in all departments to make the necessary revisions and deletions without downgrading the quality of education in Pennsbury. Since State Aid provided 23.59% of the revenue for the current budget but will provide only 18.45% for next year's budget, anyone can realize that an 11.15% increase is modest indeed. An uncontrollable fact is that the amount of receipts required from local sources has increased a full 10% in two years. This next year 4.8 mills of the 21.5 mills required for the budget increase are a direct result of the decrease in state aid. Of the remaining 16.7 mills, 14.4 mills are required for Debt Service, Fixed Expenses and All Salaries. Only 2.28 mills of the increase go for educational supplies, utilities and custodial and maintenance supplies. This is a surprisingly low increase when one examines the real inflationary costs that affect all consumers today. Accompanying this year's budget is the board's adopted Goals and Objectives for next year, including the financial impact that it has on the proposed budget; therefore, it is possible for the board and the community to observe that any increases, no matter how slight, are a direct result of educational commitments on the part of the board, administration, staff and community. Since the administration and the staff, through many meetings and deliberations, have been able to effect a $418,638 (almost three full mills) reduction in the budget as it was originally drawn up, there remains little opportunity for further reductions. My staff and I, however, will stand ready to exert maximum effort to comply with the board's wishes. What we ask is that we be permitted to continue offering the kind and quality of education that the Pennsbury community needs and desires.
Figure 3(a)
(19.0K)
Figure 3(b)
(22.0K)