| Chapter Outline (See related pages)
- Introduction
- Inmates as "slaves of the state"
- The "hands-off" doctrine
- The beginnings of the prisoners' rights movement
- Attica, 1971
- Conditions at Attica
- for inmates
- mail and reading material restricted
- 14-16 hours per day in the cell
- tight regulations and many petty rules
- for officers
- monotonous work
- culture conflict with inmates
- frustration, tension, and fear
- racism, fueled by conflict between the races outside the walls.
- The revolt
- growing tensions between officers and inmates
- precipitating incidents
- The assault
- failed negotiations
- assault by state police
- 10 officer hostages and 29 inmates killed, all by state police gunfire
- In Pursuit of Prisoners' Rights
- The traditional view of inmates and the reluctance of the courts to
intervene in prison affairs
- The Writ of Habeas Corpus
- challenging the lawfulness of confinement
- extended to challenging the conditions of confinement
- Civil rights and prisoners, rights
- Civil Rights Act of 1871 (Section 1983)
- Monroe v. Pape (1961), citizens can sue state officials
in federal court for violation of civil rights
- later Supreme Court rulings apply to prison inmates
- does not require exhaustion of state remedies and can result in
monetary damages
- Legal Services in Prison
- Ex parte Hull (1941), inmate access to the courts
- Johnson v. Avery (1969)
- absence of meaningful access to the courts
- the rise of "jailhouse lawyers"
- in the absence of alternative legal services, jailhouse lawyers
must be permitted to assist inmates seeking postconviction relief
- subsequent decisions in the 1970s
- Jailhouse lawyers
- perceived threats to prison administration
- the continuing significance of the role of jailhouse lawyers
- Constitutional Rights and Civil Disabilities
- Bills of attainder, prohibited by the U.S. Constitution
- Civil death, the loss of all civil rights
- Religion
- traditionally encouraged or even required
- the Black Muslim movement of the 1960s
- Mail and media interviews
- restrictions on mail to prevent trafficking in contraband, prevent
communication concerning escape plots, etc.
- U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the 1970s limited prison officials,
power to totally restrict inmate mail communication (Procunier
v. Martinez, 1974)
- The "reasonableness" standard replaces the "substantial government
interest" standard in 1989 (Thornburgh v. Abbot)
- Rehabilitative services
- rehabilitative treatment is not a constitutional right
- restrictions on rehabilitative practices that seem more like punishment
(A Clockwork Orange)
- some treatment programs may be mandatory (education, mental illness)
- Medical services
- Estelle v. Gamble, 1976, deliberate indifference
- prison responses to HIV/AIDS
- Prisoner labor unions, no constitutional right to form a union
- Prison Discipline and Constitutional Rights
- Papillon and the French penal colonies
- The Arkansas prison scandal
- abuses of inmates, "The Tucker Telephone"
- Thomas O. Merton
- the trusty system
- corruption exposed to the press in 1968
- Arkansas prison system declared unconstitutional in 1970, Holt
v. Sarver
- Solitary confinement
- traditional means of disciplining inmates
- solitary confinement is not unconstitutional, certain conditions
of confinement may be unconstitutional
- The Lash, Jackson v. Bishop (1968), whipping is in violation
of the Eighth Amendment
- Prison disciplinary proceedings
- traditionally arbitrary administrative operations controlled by
wardens
- requirement for due process, Wolff v. McDonnell (1974)
- The Conditions of Incarceration
- Prisons should not impose punishment of a barbaric nature above and
beyond incarceration
- The Texas prison suit
- Texas prisons in the 1970s
- the problem of overcrowding
- breakdown of control in the early 1980s
- Ruiz v. Estelle (1980), Texas system declared unconstitutional
- The New Mexico inmate massacre
- Future prospects
- continuing problems related to overcrowding and poor prison conditions
- the riots at Deer Lodge, Montana (1991), and Lucasville, Ohio (1993)
- lockdowns used to confine inmates around the clock as a control
device
- continuing problems at Attica and New Mexico State Penitentiary
- Reform Versus Law and Order
- The prison dilemma of the 1990s, increasing inmate rights and unprecedented
growth in prison populations
- Rhodes v. Chapman (1981), double-celling is not unconstitutional
considering "totality of circumstances"
- Hudson v. Palmer, (1984), inmates have no Fourth Amendment
protection
- Wilson v. Seiter, (1991), inmate must prove "deliberate
indifference" by prison officials when alleging that confinement violates
the Eighth Amendment
- Privatization of corrections, prisons built and operated by private
business
|
|