Site MapHelpFeedbackChapter Objectives
Chapter Objectives
(See related pages)

Following are the main learning objectives from the chapter. To help you coordinate your studies, these objectives are organized into sub-sections (12-1, 12-2, etc.) and listed with the relevant page numbers from the textbook.
Objective 12-1
(See page(s) 448-452)

Recognize the special nature of moral reasoning.
  • Know that moral reasoning concerns itself with nonfactual value judgments.
  • Define value judgments.
Objective 12-2
(See page(s) 452-457)

Be familiar with the general characteristics of moral arguments.
  • Differentiate sharply between factual claims and value judgments and see how they work together in moral reasoning.
  • Understand how the naturalistic fallacy arises in moral arguments and how it is to be prevented.
  • Recognize the ultimate appeal to consistency and fairness in every species of moral reasoning.
Objective 12-3
(See page(s) 459-469)

See, learn, and know the major philosophical perspectives on what moral reasoning is and why it works.
  • Be able to define moral relativism and subjectivism and differentiate both of them from the anthropological fact of cultural pluralism.
  • Learn the definition and the basic argumentative strategy of utilitarianism.
  • Know what deontology is and how Kantian duty theory analyzes moral obligation.
  • Be able to explain how divine command theory finds a place in moral reasoning alongside the other theories.
  • Understand what virtue theory is and the crucial points at which it deviates from other moral theories.
Objective 12-4
(See page(s) 469-473)

Know what makes legal reasoning resemble moral reasoning but also which characteristics are unique to each one.
  • Understand the special nature of legal principles and how they compare to moral principles.
  • Know the meanings of the four kinds of grounds one might give for justifying a law: legal moralism, the harm principle, legal paternalism, and the offense principle.
  • Recognize the special role that appeals to precedent play in legal reasoning: be able to explain stare decisis.
Objective 12-5
(See page(s) 473-481)

Become familiar with the defining characteristics of aesthetic reasoning and the methods unique to arguments in aesthetics.
  • Learn the eight aesthetic principles most often adduced in discussions of art.
  • Realize that sometimes more than one of these eight principles might be at work in a single argument, but that while these principles might be consistent with one another it is also possible for them to conflict.
  • Be sensitive to the controversies over what aesthetic arguments mean, controversies parallel in some ways to those concerning moral reasoning but divergent from them in other ways.







MooreOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 12 > Chapter Objectives