| Organizational Behavior: Solutions for Management Paul D. Sweeney,
University of Central Florida Dean B. McFarlin,
University of Dayton
Motivating Employees to do Their Best
Chapter Outline- Motivation: "The Big Issue"Motivation is argued to be the most important
issue in organizational behavior.
- Managers can underestimate the complex connection between motivation
and performance.
- In reality, many factors that affect performance have little or nothing
to do with motivation.
- Managers must accurately diagnose both people and situations in order
to be excellent at motivation.
- Managers cannot directly observe motivation.
- What is Motivation?
- The word motivation comes from the Latin word movere.
- It is best for managers to view motivation as a process that uses
"triggers" to arouse employee effort along with steps to channel behavior
toward achieving goals.
- Content theories of motivation: Perspectives that identify specific
needs that energize behavior.
- Process theories of motivation: Explain the processes by which can
be aroused and then directed.
- What Motivates?
- Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs:
- According to Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs individuals are motivated
by five needs.
- Psychological needs
- Safety needs
- Social needs
- Esteem needs
- Self-actualization needs
- Maslow's limitations:
- Needs are not always triggered in the exact order as he described.
- Using Maslow:
- Despite its limitations, Maslow's theory does alert managers
to the possible needs that drive behavior.
- Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory:
- Frederick Herzberg's two-factor theory: classifies needs into two
groups.
- Hygiene factors: include working conditions, pay, and co-worker
relations.
- Motivating factors: include the need for achievement, challenge,
and recognition.
- Motivating factors are similar to Maslow's higher order needs.
- Hygiene factors are similar to Maslow's lower order need.
- Herzberg argues that what causes employees to be dissatisfied
is different than what causes employees to be satisfied and engaged
in their jobs.
- Herzberg's limitations:
- His ideas have helped the development of the concept of job enrichment.
- The distinction between hygiene and motivating factors is not
clear as it appears to be.
- Using Herzberg's ideas:
- The key message is that many people will respond more enthusiastically
to motivating factors than anything else.
- Ignoring hygiene factors can result in resentment.
- Managing the "How to Motivate" Process
- Equity Theory: How Fairness Drives Motivation: The heart of the equity
theory indicates that when you feel unfairly treated you are motivated to
restore a sense of fairness.
- Limitations of equity theory:
- Does not precisely identify whom we choose to compare ourselves
against.
- Applying the ideas of this theory abroad can be highly complex.
- Inequity reduction strategies: implications for managers:
- Ways employees attempt to reduce inequity:
- Change their inputs and/or outcomes.
- Engage in a variety of cognitive gymnastics to change their perceptions
about inputs and/or outcomes.
- Find a new comparison person that will result in a more balanced
ratio.
- Change venues to find better ratios.
- Creating an equitable workplace:
- Perhaps the best way to create a sense of fairness is to convince
employees that outcomes will be distributed fairly over the long
haul.
- Modify certain benefits to better address the needs of the employees.
- Wage tiers: building in unfairness:
- Viewed by U.S. firms as a way to reduce labor costs.
- Employees can perceive this system as being unfair and inequitable.
- Research suggests that low-tier workers may be less committed
to the firm and less trusting of management.
- High turnover rates, poor moral, and low productivity is common
to low-tier workers.
- "Churning" employees and other equity concerns:
- "Churning": a process in which many employees are terminated
while at the same time many new applicants are hired.
- Reinforcement Theory: Using Consequences to Motivate: If the equity
theory is about fairness then it can be said that the reinforcement theory
is about consequences.
- Reinforcing positive behavior:
- Positive reinforcement:
- Consequences such as praise
- Negative reinforcement:
- Stopping something unpleasant
- Snuffing out negative behavior:
- Extinction: remove what is reinforcing the negative behavior.
- Punishment: administering a sanction to extinguish the behavior.
- Managers can underestimate the negative long-term side effects
of punishment.
- Anger
- Resentment
- Cynicism
- Fear
- Suggestions to prevent the potential side effects of punishment:
- Always punish in private.
- Focus specifically on the behavior in question and why it needs
to be changed.
- Discuss or specify alternative steps or behaviors that will help
prevent mistakes from being repeated.
- Explain what will happen if the behavior does not improve by
a specific deadline.
- Be consistent when enforcing policies.
- Understanding reinforcement schedules:
- Positive reinforcement is generally the most powerful tool.
- Understand there is a choice between continuous and partial approaches
to reinforcement.
- Partial reinforcement strategies are most often the most practical
and desirable.
- Using reinforcement strategies to modify behavior:
- The need for diagnosis is ongoing.
- Situations are always changing and reinforcers do not last forever.
- Limitations of reinforcement theory:
- Managers often find that applying reinforcement ideas is easier
when the jobs involved are relatively simple and financial rewards
can be used.
- Cultural differences can be challenging in the context of reinforcement
application.
- Goal Theory: Using Targets to Motivate:
- Goal theory: establishing future performance targets.
- Goals can be useful for stimulating, guiding, and directing behavior.
- Goal attributes:
- The old rule of thumb stated clear and challenging goals promote
higher performance than ambiguous goals.
- This holds true with relatively simple tasks but it may work less
well with novel or complex tasks or tasks that involve working with
others interdependently.
- Goal commitment and the goal-setting process:
- Goal commitment is the employee's willingness to pursue a goal.
- The manager's "goal" of goal setting is to obtain employee commitment.
- Stretch targets: Virtually unattainable goals designed to encourage
"doing it differently" rather than "doing what we already do" better.
- Applying goal setting: management by objectives:
- Companies often practice goal setting through a management by
objectives program.
- Management by objectives: systematic use of goal setting throughout
the organization.
- Suggestions for a successful MBO program include:
- Identify subordinate responsibility areas and how they fit together.
- Discuss and establish performance targets. Discuss and agree
on how performance will be assessed.
- Prioritize goals.
- Establish a time frame for achievement.
- Cultural barriers to using goal setting and MBO programs:
- A basic assumption behind many MBO programs in the U.S. is that
employees are comfortable talking about goals with their superiors.
- Also assumes that employees embrace risk since reaching goals
is not guaranteed.
- Other cultures would have different philosophies on these concepts.
- Expectancy Theory: Pulling Things Together:
- This is the most inclusive of the theories examined here.
- Expectancy theory starts with the assumption that employees are rational.
- It suggests that employees will choose to give maximum effort to
their jobs if they believe that their jobs will give them what they
want.
- Overall, expectancy theory suggests our assessments of expectancy,
instrumentality, and valence all must be strong for motivation to be
high.
- Using expectancy theory: advice for managers:
- Find out which rewards have valence for subordinates.
- Take steps to maintain high expectancies among subordinates.
- Make sure valued rewards are clearly linked to performance.
- Skill-based pay programs.
- Culture and expectancy theory:
- Expectancy theory generally fits well with American culture.
- In other cultures, employees' perspectives may be different.
- This theory implicitly suggests that reward systems should reflect
employees' cultural values.
|
|