You must have javascript enabled to view this website. Please change your browser preferences to enable javascript, and reload this page.
The Snake Relate: Explain the relationship between a physical stimulus and the kinds of sensory that result from it. For this exercise, think about snakes. Snakes are a good way to think about the differences between sensation and perception.
The Snake Relate: Explain the relationship between a physical stimulus and the kinds of sensory that result from it. For this exercise, think about snakes. Snakes are a good way to think about the differences between sensation and perception. Let’s look at this.
The Snake Relate: Explain the relationship between a physical stimulus and the kinds of sensory that result from it. For this exercise, think about snakes. Snakes are a good way to think about the differences between sensation and perception. In our example, the subject has never actually touched or heard a snake. Find someone who like snakes, who owns a snake, or who has dealt with snakes in the past and as him/her the same questions.
The Snake Relate: Explain the relationship between a physical stimulus and the kinds of sensory that result from it. For this exercise, think about snakes. Snakes are a good way to think about the differences between sensation and perception. Are you answers the same or different? It is likely they are very different. This difference is based on sensation and perception.
Just Picture It!! Remember: Describe the basic processes that underlie the sense of vision.
What Do You Think? React: Distinguish the skin senses; describe the skin sense and discuss how they relate to the experience of pain.
Gestalt Laws Remember: Make sense of and explain the Gestalt laws of organization. According to the Gestalt laws of organization, humans tend to organize information in specific ways. For each Gestalt concept below, comment on what the purpose this may serve. For example, grouping together elements that are similar may serve an important function in identifying objects quickly. List at least 5 possible reasons why each concept is used.
That's a Puppy Relate: Identify the top-down and bottom up processing. As children, we use bottom-up processing. In other words, small children build a knowledge base by continually refining large information sets into increasingly smaller sets. You can see this clearly as a child learns to speak. Imagine you are teaching a child to speak, and you have a puppy at home.
The Mask Remember: Define perceptual constancy
The Glass Floor Remember: Explain depth perception.
Strike! Remember: Relate motion to daily life
Perceptual Illusions Relate: Determine the important of perceptual illusions
Tarantula Terror Find a friend to help you with this activity. As you read the following statement, closely note your friend's body language during the activity. Write down your observations.
There is No Reality, Only Perception!
the case of. . . the cautious pilot Captain Kevin Mueller has been flying private and commercial aircraft for almost 30 years. His flight from Boston to Dallas on the night of November 4 was as routine as any other; Mueller and his copilot had run through their preflight routine in the darkness of the cockpit and, after a 20-minute delay, were cleared for takeoff. Halfway through the flight, Captain Mueller noticed something unusual out of the corner of his eye: a point of light that was initially very faint but growing brighter. It stood out against the backdrop of terrestrial light sources because it appeared to be much closer, and possibly moving. Knowing that no other aircraft were operating in the area, Mueller focused his attention on the mysterious light source, concerned only with whether it might pose a threat to the safety of his passengers and crew. When at last Mueller still couldn't make out what the mysterious object was after observing it for several minutes, he decided to take no chances. He rapidly increased altitude to put more distance between his aircraft and the object, which eventually faded from view and did not return. A later investigation could make no determination of what Mueller saw, but concluded that he acted appropriately to protect his passengers.